How was the case of United States v Stevens?

In United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010), the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a federal law criminalizing the creation, distribution, or possession of images of animal cruelty as substantially overbroad. The Court resisted efforts by the federal government to create a new unprotected category of speech.

Who won the us vs Stevens case?

Decision. On April 20, 2010, the Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court ruling in an 8–1 decision written by Chief Justice Roberts, with Justice Alito dissenting. The Court found that Section 48 was substantially overbroad and so was invalid under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Which United States Supreme Court case from 2010 found a code making it illegal to possess material depicting animal cruelty violated the First Amendment of the Constitution?

United States v. Stevens, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on April 20, 2010, ruled (8–1) that a federal law banning depictions of animal cruelty violated the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech.

How was the case of the US vs Stevens in 2010 similar to Marbury v Madison?

Stevens in 2010 similar to the Marbury v. Madison case? o It challenged the power of judicial review but was unsuccessful. O It challenged the power of judicial review and caused it to be revoked. It was an example of Congress amending the Constitution.

Who won Edwards v South Carolina?

In an 8-1 decision authored by Justice Potter Stewart, the Court reversed the criminal convictions of the black students.

What is the significance of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Gibbons v Ogden case quizlet?

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824), was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.

Is a judicial review?

judicial review, power of the courts of a country to examine the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative arms of the government and to determine whether such actions are consistent with the constitution. Actions judged inconsistent are declared unconstitutional and, therefore, null and void.

What cases are related to Marbury v. Madison?

Madison and the Dred Scott decision. Marbury v. Madison, legal case in which, on February 24, 1803, the U.S. Supreme Court first declared an act of Congress unconstitutional, thus establishing the doctrine of judicial review.

Why did 187 protestors gather at the South Carolina State House in this case?

Facts of the case 187 black students were convicted in a magistrate’s court of breach of the peace for peacefully assembling at the South Carolina State Government. Their purpose was to submit a protest of grievances to the citizens of South Carolina, and to the legislative bodies of South Carolina.

Why did the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students who wore armbands?

They ruled in favor of the students. It held that armbands were form of “speech” because the armbands were symbols representing ideas. What amendment protected the students rights to wear the arm bands in the Tinker Case?

What was a result of Gibbons v. Ogden?

What was a result of Gibbons v. Ogden? Aaron Ogden got permission to operate his steamboats in New York. Thomas Gibbons was allowed to operate his steamboats in New York.

What was the conflict between Gibbons and Ogden about?

Ogden is a 1824 landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States, which gave Congress complete power in regulating interstate commerce. The case questioned whether or not the State of New York could regulate interstate commerce – typically Congress’ right.

What was the Supreme Court decision in United States v Stevens?

Finally, the Third Circuit held that there is an insufficient link between § 48 and “preventing cruelty to animals,” because § 48 merely prohibits the depiction of animal cruelty, instead of actual cruelty to animals. The United States petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari, which the Court granted on April 20, 2009.

What was the third tape in the Stevens case?

The third tape depicted a pit bull attacking a domestic pig as part of the dog being trained to catch and kill wild hog and included “a gruesome depiction of a pit bull attacking the lower jaw of a domestic farm pig.”

What was the Miller test in Stevens v.united States?

The language tracked the ” Miller test ,” used by the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether speech could be prosecuted for obscenity or was protected by the First Amendment. In 2004, Stevens was indicted under 18 U.S.C. § 48 for creating and selling three video tapes, two of which depicted pit bulls engaged in dog fighting.

Who was accused of animal cruelty in the US v Stevens?

Stevens was not accused of engaging in animal cruelty himself or of shooting the original footage from which the videos were created. However, the footage in each of the videos “is accompanied by introductions, narration and commentary by Stevens, as well as accompanying literature of which Stevens is the author.”